Care Integration Requires Re-thinking Care Delivery Processes-Part 1

This post is the sixth of an 11-part series that proposes structures and actions that characterize successful accountable care organizations. Click here to download A Model for Value-Based Provider/Payer Partnerships white paper that covers the subject more in-depth.

The term clinical integration is commonly cited as a foundational enabler of accountable care and fee-for-value, but there is no consistent, single definition of clinical integration.Cynthia Kilroy

Based on Federal Trade Commission (FTC) statements, the following can describe five primary legal characteristics of clinical integration[1]:

  • Monitoring and controlling quality, service and costs
  • Selectively choosing a physician network that includes primary care and specialist
  • Having a well-developed care management program that uses evidence-based guidelines for a broad spectrum of diseases and disorders
  • Showing significant investment by physicians in both time and capital
  • Integrating data management, enabling extensive data collection, information sharing, quality reporting and utilization review

Clinical integration is far from easy. Clinical processes can be fragmented, redundant, conflicting and—perhaps most daunting—heavily ingrained. Integration of care requires rethinking the delivery processes to coordinate patient care services across people, functions, activities and operational units to maximize the value of services delivered.

Becoming clinically integrated means collectively defining acute and disease-specific standards of care, educating physicians on the standards, providing tools to support physician compliance and measuring physician performance against the defined standards. The key to clinical integration is to continually monitor and evaluate performance that will identify areas of opportunity to improve care delivery across providers and improve physician performance.

Our next ACO models for success post will delve deeper into how clinical integration affects the delivery of care.

Resources:

Cynthia Kilroy, Sr. Vice President, Provider Strategic Initiatives, Optum


[1] “Clinical Integration: A Guide to Working with the Federal Trade Commission to Enhance Care Through Pro- Patient, Pro-Innovation, Pro-Efficiency Provider Networks,” Foley & Lardner, LLP. Published January 21, 2009. Accessed October 19, 2012. http://www.foley.com/intelligence/detail.aspx?int=9217

3 thoughts on “Care Integration Requires Re-thinking Care Delivery Processes-Part 1

  1. Pingback: Empowering patients to support population health initiatives | Healthcare Exchange

  2. Pingback: Improving overall population health starts at better care for individuals | Healthcare Exchange

  3. Pingback: Leveraging technology to support the sharing of information and drive decision making | Healthcare Exchange

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s